Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Eylon 💨 pfp
Eylon 💨
@eylon.eth
This is very, very important https://twitter.com/nikitabier/status/1800197768981762396
8 replies
2 recasts
33 reactions
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Nikita is smart and world-class at tactics. But hasn’t built anything at-scale or enduring.
3 replies
0 recast
30 reactions
Ben 🟪 pfp
Ben 🟪
@benersing
The distinction he makes here is important: “a blowout launch.” That's quite different from a soft release to a handful of early users as you refine the product.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
chimp.fun’s dev 🐒 pfp
chimp.fun’s dev 🐒
@alexk
This is an interesting take for consumer products On the other hand I think builders should aim for feedback as early as possible to not waste time on building the wrong thing
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zeen Train pfp
Zeen Train
@zeentrain
I think this isn’t narrowly defined enough, there are probably certain sectors where first impressions matter more (such as Crypto data platforms) but I don’t think this is wholistic
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kien 🙏 pfp
Kien 🙏
@kienfam
Most new products dont need a blowout launch. Those who do are usually building in the validated market
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
AfroRick pfp
AfroRick
@afrorick
That doesn't just go for consumer products. Goes for enterprise products as well. If you ship garbage - don't expect to be able to keep coming back to that customer with new releases. Evaluating your trash product has a cost, and most corporate buyers will own pay it once.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
RJ (replyor) pfp
RJ (replyor)
@shulzzz
It is, but how do you think it applies here? Also, there are always exceptions even if the general rule applies
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rch 🎩 pfp
Rch 🎩
@rch
"if you're planning a blowout launch..." and so many counter examples.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction