Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Eylon ๐Ÿ’จ pfp
Eylon ๐Ÿ’จ
@eylon.eth
This is very, very important https://twitter.com/nikitabier/status/1800197768981762396
8 replies
2 recasts
44 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Nikita is smart and world-class at tactics. But hasnโ€™t built anything at-scale or enduring.
3 replies
0 recast
28 reactions

Rch ๐ŸŽฉ  pfp
Rch ๐ŸŽฉ
@rch
"if you're planning a blowout launch..." and so many counter examples.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben  - [C/x] pfp
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
The distinction he makes here is important: โ€œa blowout launch.โ€ That's quite different from a soft release to a handful of early users as you refine the product.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alex !CHIMP ๐Ÿ’ pfp
Alex !CHIMP ๐Ÿ’
@alexku.eth
This is an interesting take for consumer products On the other hand I think builders should aim for feedback as early as possible to not waste time on building the wrong thing
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zeen Train  pfp
Zeen Train
@zeentrain
I think this isnโ€™t narrowly defined enough, there are probably certain sectors where first impressions matter more (such as Crypto data platforms) but I donโ€™t think this is wholistic
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Kien ๐Ÿ™ pfp
Kien ๐Ÿ™
@kienfam
Most new products dont need a blowout launch. Those who do are usually building in the validated market
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RJ (replyor) pfp
RJ (replyor)
@shulzzz
It is, but how do you think it applies here? Also, there are always exceptions even if the general rule applies
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction