Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The day I can delete Telegram forever will be a great day.
27 replies
13 recasts
120 reactions

Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
It’s better than any other messenger tho
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Signal: am I a joke to you?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
yes - I don't want to give out a phone number
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Ah that’s a fair point.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
this is why I like the Farcaster direct casts approach by @cassie - same encryption as Signal as far as I understand but no phone number supposedly XMTP plans to take a similar approach over time but Farcaster DCs don't have good good cross platform support + both don't work with groups, so telegram it is for now
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
one challenge with x-platform support is that it intrinsically weakens security. how do you know if your counterparty using a different app is not leaking all your data because of a bad implementation? no one has a good answer for this today.
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

EulerLagrangodamus - tevm/acc pfp
EulerLagrangodamus - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
1/ I actually do. I call it “optimistically enforced chain of custody”. So Alice and Bob stake some ETH into a contract. When Bob decrypts a message from Alice, Bob’s public key is imprinted on the platintext. To remove Bob’s imprint would also remove Alice’s signature.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrangodamus - tevm/acc pfp
EulerLagrangodamus - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
2/ So Bob only has signed data with him public key imprinted. If he shared messages with Charlie, Charlie can submit a tx to the staking contract to claim part of the stake. It’s important that Alice can’t fake Bob’s imprint, otherwise she could claim a part of the stake.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction