Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
I wonder if you could compile solidity into an intermediate representation, which can be further compiled to: 1. EVM bytecode 2. Zk-friendly VM Half baked idea that requires associating the ZK instructions with the deployed contracts. You could run a sidecar along with main chain that’s zk-friendly. Idk how but maybe you could easily generate ZKPs of a tx’s state update from just: 1. State root 2. Tx hash 3. Signature —- The proof should be done over the zk friendly sidecar so it can be much quicker. Then maybe we can have commit/reveal block building?
3 replies
1 recast
26 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Sequencing* instead of block building
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
This would require all validators to have the source or IR available, interesting to think about how that would work
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Royal pfp
Royal
@royalaid.eth
LLVM-IR of EVM/ZKVM?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions