Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑
@mikedemarais.eth
if rainbow wanted to subsidize creation of farcaster accounts for users that have not created one yet, is it possible to leverage zkTLS to require users to have specific metrics on their twitter accounts in order to qualify for the subsidization? ie: only subsidize users whos twitter accounts were made before X date, or only subsidize users with more than X number of tweets
15 replies
12 recasts
152 reactions
mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑
@mikedemarais.eth
can zkTLS be utilized to more easily allow users to port their social graph from twitter to farcaster? ie like follow all the people on farcaster that you follow on twitter? or is this what Warpcast's latest "Connect your X" experiment is meant to eventually solve for? are the Twitter accounts people connect to their profiles here exposed via API?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Manan
@manan
yes, connected Twitter accounts that people connect on farcaster are available via API today and will be on the protocol soon. https://warpcast.com/rish/0xff10f276
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
There is a trust assumption on merkle though. zktls would make it trust minimized
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Manan
@manan
can you elaborate how the set up where zkTLS minimizes trust would work?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
https://medium.com/@vinayak_35433/opacity-network-trust-but-verify-eb819ebb0b0a
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manan
@manan
> This enables a proof by committee to prove ownership of a web2 account, and Opacity’s framework expects users to generate ten identical proofs by different nodes in order to claim a web2 account. What does this practically mean for a user? Do users have to go through Twitter OAuth 10 times, once each with an app for each node or do they need to publicly post some content on Twitter that each of the 10 nodes can independently verify?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
