Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Poll on app / protocol name question Varun asked yesterday Note: this is not a formal vote, but a input into the discussion. See the reply for additional context.
101 replies
249 recasts
773 reactions

Elliott Alexander pfp
Elliott Alexander
@escottalexander
This is a super hard question. I can see the appeal of wanting to just unify the names so that it is easy for users to digest and share etc. but I think calling both the app and protocol Farcaster means you are sacrificing *at least the appearance* of credible neutrality. Now 99% of users don’t care about that but the builders want to know that they won’t get rugged 5-10 years down the road. And the builders are the ones who bring users. By keeping the names separate you help foster a level playing field where other clients can grow.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction