+1 but imo too many think of NFTs as stickers and CPGs

More bullish on sticking to a single collection

building far.quest & @wieldlabs.eth. cofounder at miy.com ventures. FID #274. Previously Square/Cash App. https://hiimnico.xyz/

and even fewer as an investment in an artist's body of work, and their commitment to it. 

we've got a long way to go, but so many use cases (for art and non-art as well)

making code & art do things they were not intended to do (to you) | https://iterative.wtf

be cool to see artists experiment & dedicate all effort to one collection of their own, instead of say using SuperRare's contract

in many cases, artists will use a contract created with manifold that SuperRare will then display on the artist's profile page.

i still think curation is important. and i thin SuperRare does that really well. tho they get shit for it (and I gave them shit for it too). i don't know what FNDs purpose is. If it's just an aggregate, why would anyone use FND over OS? genuine question. fwiw. i have a profile on FND. So i'm curious.

FND as well. 

It's been pretty cool seeing marketplaces just adapt and allow it to happen. 

FND killing their legacy contract was a really pivotal moment IMO.

Sadly, this has only happened for a very small group. I’ve been waiting on them to index my manifold contract for over a year, and have politely followed up multiple times. Imo they must restructure away from the default contract in order to future proof.