Nat Emodi pfp
Nat Emodi
@emodi
if we analogize consumer internet deployment + adoption with web3, are we closest to 1/ 1986 2/ 1996 3/ 2006 why?
8 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

zico pfp
zico
@zico
2 when charted on a graph, don't they look eerily similar & aren't we around 1997?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

orb pfp
orb
@orb
'96 post BBS/IRC/Usenet culture growing into tech that is awesome but completely half-assedly developed and on its way to figuring out its full potential. we're not selling trivial crap like tupperware either, which is awesome
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

derek pfp
derek
@derek
1. 1986 We’re all protocols, no browsers. We have the early beginnings of SMTP, HTTP, TCP/IP, IMAP, IRC, etc. But very few Netscape, mIRC, AOL, or email clients. And those that do exist are rudimentary at best.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
1/ 1986 – 1986 marked the end of the Homebrew Computer Club, and very similarly, this year will mark the end of the current generation of crypto, and enter the new generation – where crypto becomes the whole of the web.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben  πŸŸͺ pfp
Ben πŸŸͺ
@benersing
@perl Web3 Evolution
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben  πŸŸͺ pfp
Ben πŸŸͺ
@benersing
4/ none of the above. It's a totally different dynamic and marketplace now. Building when there are already established, at scale incumbents for nearly every web3 product currently being built, is an entirely different animal from web1 or web2. Once we see net new native web3 products, then we can compare adoption.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

πŸ—Ώ π’ƒπ’Šπ’‚π’” pfp
πŸ—Ώ π’ƒπ’Šπ’‚π’”
@bias
1996 β€’ Slow pace piecemeal adoption from single family homes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

darran pfp
darran
@darran
1996. We had most of the core experiences consumers use today, they were just clunky and easily broken.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction