Does it bother you that most web3 products don’t have a business model?

Building getinboxzero.com and sharemint.xyz.

I also run a YouTube channel, "Learn from Open Source": youtube.com/elie2222 

Ethereum enthusiast exploring frontier of layer 2s, gamefi, and decentralized apps. Read my latest thoughts at https://paragraph.xyz/@non-fungiblethoughts/

Ya it’s annoying. Sometimes it’s regulatory concerns. But it’s also that the market enables it. If you can print free internet money who needs revenue. Uniswap doing just fine with fees turned off

Bothers me less than the ones that DO have a business model but dont implement it because there supposed to be some virtue in growing big before testing if you are profitable

Magic internet money is a model but doesn’t last. Why almost all charts are down to the right

Number go up is not a business model? 😅

i'd rather kill the radio and listen to the rain hit.

Would be interested to find examples of business models 😅

But some examples:
Farcaster 
Uniswap 
The Graph
Aave

Last two actually do but tiny revenues. And Farcaster I’m not actually worried for and can understand not yet monetising. But many services are run off magic internet money

you'll have to give an example, but generally no, because of the community-first ethos we see a lot here

founders can envision a business model, but the community can also be consulted once it's live

I feel like it's swimming with the current (of users), vs building a dam (to retain them)