Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ε‘‚δΈΉε†Šε·₯ pfp
ε‘‚δΈΉε†Šε·₯
@gami
Sendit β†— action (mvp) is here + Deploy any media cast to @zora + Creator rewards (ether) to caster + Create referral rewards to /sendit + First minter rewards to actioneer + Mint referral rewards for sharing Positive-sum piracy on @base Encouraging casters to mint Built w. @undefined <3 https://go.sendit.city
40 replies
7 recasts
99 reactions

eirrann | he/him pfp
eirrann | he/him
@eirrann.eth
This is a horrible idea. Artists should be able to share their artwork on FC, minted, WIP or otherwise, without fear that some random person will mint it without their permission , on a random contract they don't own it control This allows anyone to re-mint artwork that already is minted elsewhere, spuriously
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

stellabelle πŸ”ͺ pfp
stellabelle πŸ”ͺ
@stellabelle
2400 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eirrann | he/him pfp
eirrann | he/him
@eirrann.eth
I appreciate your degenerosity, Stella I hope anything that comes from this 'thought experiment' is thought through more deeply to mitigate the egregious ethical concerns
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

ε‘‚δΈΉε†Šε·₯ pfp
ε‘‚δΈΉε†Šε·₯
@gami
as per the iterations i've described already, that were a direct result of your feedback, can you please explain how providing a way for artists to streamline their experience from validating an idea, to minting a completed work, in a positive-sum way, where they maintain full control, is an egregious ethical concern?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

eirrann | he/him pfp
eirrann | he/him
@eirrann.eth
Let me try to explain again: original caster β‰  artist/creator enabling frictionless unethical behavior is unethical you have attempted to quickly explain away my concerns we then refused to acknowledge that I did not find your explanation satisfactory πŸ‘‡
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eirrann | he/him pfp
eirrann | he/him
@eirrann.eth
you then QCed that unsatisfactory explanation multiple times in a way that suggested to others that you had satisfactorily addressed the underlying ethical concerns, which I perceive as a form of gaslighting I'm not sure how else to explain this
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction