eek pfp

eek

@eek.eth

111 Following
191 Followers


eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
woudl
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
What do you mean
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
Would love to meet the PM at espn who thinks these power play name tags are a good idea
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
hottest of takes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
I routinely get emails, to erin@, where the greeting is some derivative of “hey Eric…”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
Success! And wow, seamless!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
Ah the frame says I’m not eligible - https://warpcast.com/eek.eth/0x65b7bc1b
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
Is it “posted a bounty that was successfully completed”?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
Just posted the snapshot to gauge community sentiment on the proposal I posted last week. Thanks everyone for the support! https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xad7e3612d11d56b21f0b2274e4ce825163bc1873d0e2ef809a3a98733df992a7
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
not live yet! just a proposed implementation.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
I just posted a proposal to upgrade the protocol so that its fee mechanism rewards UNI token holders that have staked and delegated their tokens. I don't think you're supposed to thread on WC so will just stick this here - read it! https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-activate-uniswap-protocol-governance/22936
4 replies
5 recasts
27 reactions

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
challenge accepted (spot == 89)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
no worries! it's easy to use each chain's explorer to find the owner of the factory as long as you know the factory's address. I'm just lazy hence the bounty.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
also, looks like you might have been providing the factory address (e.g. https://optimistic.etherscan.io/address/0x1f98431c8ad98523631ae4a59f267346ea31f984#code). I'm looking for the owner of those contracts.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
Hi! Thanks! This is a good start but not quite complete - uni governance has declared canonical deployments on a bunch of other chains. Check out the txt records on v3deployments.uniswap.eth. The network id is the key, the value is that eth address of the bridge sender contract and the destination chain factory address
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nick Tomaino🎩 pfp
Nick Tomaino🎩
@nick
Will drop the Farcaster memo next if this gets 1000 recasts
189 replies
611 recasts
743 reactions

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
Big Friday night eh
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
Description: Make a list of the `owner` address of the UniswapV3Factory on every chain where it's been declared canonical by gov. List can be in whatever medium you want, should be formatted as "networkName: 0x..." (not network ID plz). v3deployments.uniswap.eth is a good place to start. Amount: .01 ETH @bountybot
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

eek pfp
eek
@eek.eth
V4 timeline getting REAL https://x.com/UniswapFND/status/1758146187318669666?s=20
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions