Ed O'Shaughnessy
@eddieosh
I like a lot of what @balajis.eth (👋) says on the network state but I think he's very wrong on circumventing FDA regs for covid treatments. There are very significant reasons why clinical trials should take as long as they do (and why Op Warp Speed will be found to have been a massive mistake).
5 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
balajis
@balajis.eth
Banting and Best went from the idea of insulin supplementation to scaled production by Eli Lilly in about three years. That was a time when pharma moved at the speed of software. High risk, high reward. https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/frederick-banting-charles-best-james-collip-and-john-macleod
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cyrus
@cyrus
Thanks for this take. So very wary in general of the move fast and break things approach creeping into synbio and biotech. Do you have a link to his comments?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew McDowell-Sweet
@msms
Is this due to asymmetry between how an individual versus a collective experiences inertia? E.g. for a *high agency* individual like @balajis.eth, the inertia is almost agonising. At the population level, though, the inertia is actually experienced as reliable, mostly risk-free treatment.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🪷
@pdr
What compelling arguments have you found that Operation Warp Speed will be found to have been a massive mistake?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Warren
@warren
*sponsored by, Pfizer*
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction