daos

1 human 1 vote. This, in my opinion, is the way a DAO needs to be structured(not all DAOs but most). We just keep giving the people with the most money, the most power. Which ya know....most people will disagree with if you ask them....but then we bake it into our systems of governance anyway....why do we keep shooting ourselves in the foot and then pretend that it is someone else's fault? When will we hold ourselves accountable? All power to all the people. ✊

Different DAOs should have different voting mechanisms. Those are the rules of engagement. Am fond of systems where voting power is earned not bought

Building /farcastle. Tryna help humans coordinate. Just /yeet it. TANSTAAFL! https://bootleggers.wtf/

Web3 Futurist. DAO Design, Governance and Operations
FID: 14217
chriswylde.xyz

Agree. I think one lesson from last cycle is not to back a DAO into a corner and only giving them one way. I don’t even think one DAO should do it one way and another DAO use another method. 
The best way is to not have “a” way. 
Have options, depending on the situation or action being taken.

Helping build @midao. Probably on the water if I’m not thinking about crypto. /eagles /betting /off-grid

things like new members, maybe 1 person 1 vote, with votes earned by sweat. things like which work streams to fund, maybe weighted voting, with sweat and financial capital getting a say. so, even in the same dao, still have different needs, with different solutions. designing all that sounds like a job for

things like new members, maybe 1 person 1 vote, with votes earned by sweat. things like which work streams to fund, maybe weighted voting, with sweat and financial capital getting a say. so, even in the same dao, still have different needs, with different solutions. designing all that sounds like a job for https://bootleggers.wtf/

Solarpunk ☀️
/replacereality 
 /flows
/permacoolture

If buying power gives you control of the treasury that is what people are incentivized to do

Its a balance of power that needs to be figured out on a case by case basis for sure.