owned this channel for many months

just got yoinked

lmfao

1. Your last cast was 6 months ago until today
2. You were the only member of the channel and it had a single cast

Will refund you the warps some point soon when we clean up.

We've been clear channels are not decentralized, not an asset for you to sell later. Use it in good faith or lose it.

Eventually, they will be decentralized and then we won't be able to change it. 

But that's not the case today.

What should we do with egregious examples of squatted channels?

I'm going to call this individual out since it's clearly squatting — @0xg — is sitting on a bunch of city channels and not actively building communities:

/denver /la /losangeles /nyc /newyorkcity /newyork /sanfrancisco

(Also the multiple variations of city names with no activity is clear squatting and when there are active communities in /los-angeles /sf /new-york.)

A few other thoughts:

1. We have a no squatting policy for fnames and we allow ENS for a name that isn't governed by that policy.

2. We never advertised channels as something you buy and own forever. Has been centralized and experimental since we allowed anyone to create a channel last December.

3. I'm sympathetic to someone who is good faith trying to build a community, but that's not squatting.

4. Squatting is squishy, know it when you see, not deterministic.

5. Ultimately, squatters are massive negative externality on the network. It's parasitic, anti-social behavior.

Reminder, most active people on the network agree with this.

Reminder, most active people on the network agree with this.

https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x953f3b18

Las Vegas 🎰

100% 

I was forced to build /sincity because they were squatting on both Las Vegas options

Hurts the local community by fragmenting plus makes building harder

Some form of land tax, if you squat then pay to hold, escalate in proportion to lack of activity.

lol that kind of argument in italian is called "paraculata da giardinetti"