Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
In most cases, I agree with this. General topic channels don't work well in the new model. They were built an era of channels as hashtags. There will be some exceptions, but will require a lot of work from the channel owner and moderators to make sure a large channel becomes and stays a community.
13 replies
34 recasts
106 reactions

Jarrett pfp
Jarrett
@jarrettr
Generic channels should be as open as possible and be similar to what default subreddits were like imo Would be kinda interesting if one day there were “mega channels” that had their own storage and were free for people to cast in too
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The challenge is spam. Most people don't have the time / want to do the work required to make them great.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
why not just have warpcast algo determine the feed?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Stated vs. revealed 1. Owners want to control of the feed but don't want to do the work 2. Users get frustrated when they don't appear in the feed controlled by the algo
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
1. what about removing the owner entirely? example /founders. There are lot of "founder related" communities (the arena, launch caster, orangedao, etc) but why does there need to be an owner of the topic-based channel? 2. isn't that a problem on every social media feed these days?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction