Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
users will complain about posting content on a platform that gets engagement primarily from "bots", yet will brag about how many mints their NFT got in a campaign minted primarily by "bots" so bots are good if giving $$, but bad if giving replies?? to quote @geoffgolberg, "the cognitive dissonance is strong here" :)
33 replies
13 recasts
113 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
that actually makes sense? money is money, likes are status. bots don't have status.
7 replies
4 recasts
81 reactions

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
If it was just about the money they wouldnโ€™t brag. If you brag about mints, youโ€™re status signaling
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
there is status is having something that sells well? not the same as social status, but still status
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
Yeah, commercial success is worthy of status, but the point here is about when someone brags about their own success its cringe if a) it came from bot activity, and b) they otherwise complain about bots
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions