Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What is the most frustrating thing about Farcaster right now? Reply and like the replies from others that resonate. I’ll only ask clarifying questions (ie I won’t tell you you’re wrong) and then respond to a dozen or so top answers in a video this weekend with how we think about it.
103 replies
105 recasts
592 reactions
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
1. The protocol should theoretically allow for simple transactions to be seamless and they are not. Kind of a crypto problem. 2. Scanning channels is burdensome, making #3 worse 3. My actions create a worse algo. I’ll like casts to support people or because I’m influenced by their momentum. I’d like an aspirational feed rather than a reflective feed.
2 replies
0 recast
17 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Say more about #1?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
You guys have written about this recently (maybe Varun), but I’d like the the ability to have one wallet that lets me make in-feed transactions without any app handoff friction. Even considering a 30% rake.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Agree, and I don't think the 30% rake would happen. More transactions is good for the protocol without that. :)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions