Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Avoid non sequitur replies. You'll end up getting marked as spam.
12 replies
0 recast
33 reactions
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid pfp
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
For those who don't know what non sequitur means: "a conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement"
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
‎ pfp
‎
@king
by the algo or by the op?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
😂 😂 😂
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
thepencil.eth ⌐◨-◨ 🎩 pfp
thepencil.eth ⌐◨-◨ 🎩
@thepencil.eth
What about sharing an image/meme as a reply?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jack pfp
Jack
@jackten
Oh damn.. I sometimes do short posts with emojis too
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
thepencil.eth ⌐◨-◨ 🎩 pfp
thepencil.eth ⌐◨-◨ 🎩
@thepencil.eth
what some may think are non sequitur could be relevant to the parties involved, especially if they have their own inside jokes or jargon. So for now inside jokes are out or you just need to make sure it fits into someone else's construct of what a relevant comment it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
adnum pfp
adnum
@adnum
Sorry the ignorance. Non english native here. What does sequitur mean exactly?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zenigame pfp
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
what if the non sequitur is clearly (or even obscurely) a joke, meme, etc? will the algo punish you for that too?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dexter pfp
Dexter
@0xdexter
Clearly those are bots.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mikolaj pfp
Mikolaj
@mikos32.eth
How to get unmarked? 🥲
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
⋆♱ 9̷0̷†մղ ♱⋆ pfp
⋆♱ 9̷0̷†մղ ♱⋆
@90tun
bots don’t care if they’re spam, they can duplicate
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Giwa 🎩 pfp
Giwa 🎩
@0xgiwa.eth
Never do this!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction