Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The value of an FID is in the social graph—both stated (following) and revealed (activity). Profile is secondary. There is minimal (no?) value in the onchain primitive absent the above.
3 replies
3 recasts
71 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
This is why digital identity is always emergent from apps with utility. If you spend a lot of time using an app / platform / OS, it starts to become your identity. Building an identity layer is the wrong order of operations. You earn the right to be an identity layer by time spent, usage, people building on it, etc.
6 replies
3 recasts
43 reactions
Just Build
@justbuild
Seems like a strong case for why no other client could ever hope to compete with Warpcast in the long run.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰
@raulonastool
The primitive of digital identity is the attestation. Who we are is made up of what we do and the connections we make.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
Github is an example. Until public repos became prominent, no one cared about the GitHub username.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
aferg
@aaronrferguson.eth
I've seen a few people trying to sell their FID lately...is this even possible to do really? Not that I ever would...but can someone migrate their graph to an entirely new FID and let someone take over an existing one? I am skeptical this is possible
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Samir 🎩
@0xsamir
So true, if I see someone using Warpcast and want to introduce myself I will not tell him I own this wallet or this ENS, I will tell him am this user on the platform as my identity.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
