Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
cast in your home feed or your own channel or your own client freedom of speech != freedom of reach
9 replies
7 recasts
118 reactions

Juli 🎩↑ pfp
Juli 🎩↑
@juli
maybe good for warpcast product near-term but I hope for other clients with diff policies. For me, a person whose reach is (secretly, for no good reason) limited vs others is rugged of freedom of speach. “You can speak your mind, but only at home with 0 listeners, no one will hurt you” isn’t freedom in any way.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> “You can speak your mind, but only at home with 0 listeners, no one will hurt you” isn’t freedom in any way. You're always free to speak to your own followers. Channels are someone else's space / distribution.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Juli 🎩↑ pfp
Juli 🎩↑
@juli
Policies per channel and enforcement by channel hosts are absolutely ok. I’m mostly referring to freedom of speech /= reach & was still caught up by the platform auto-mod feature that is going to hide posts from accounts. Would be good to show users why their reach is limited in channel x, so they can reach out.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Leo pfp
Leo
@lsn
And in the possible future, someone else’s personal property (onchain)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction