Wowow, I would spend $10k to express my first amendment rights and still get rugged! 😭

cast in your home feed or your own channel or your own client

freedom of speech != freedom of reach

maybe good for warpcast product near-term but I hope for other clients with diff policies.

For me, a person whose reach is (secretly, for no good reason) limited vs others is rugged of freedom of speach.

“You can speak your mind, but only at home with 0 listeners, no one will hurt you” isn’t freedom in any way.

job: token analyst. Talk to me about football, sports, crypto, outdoors, growth, econ, investing, chess

> “You can speak your mind, but only at home with 0 listeners, no one will hurt you” isn’t freedom in any way.

You're always free to speak to your own followers. Channels are someone else's space / distribution.

Policies per channel and enforcement by channel hosts are absolutely ok.

I’m mostly referring to freedom of speech /= reach & was still caught up by the platform auto-mod feature that is going to hide posts from accounts.

Would be good to show users why their reach is limited in channel x, so they can reach out.

All have some “spammy” behavior.

Hoping for
a) “bad” spam to be reduced
b) measures not iteratively worsening
c) more good clients but expect warpcast to be the main interface for most in the next years.

Warpcast policies/penalties will be felt.

User filters could be more fine-grained, opt-in, less damaging.

> mostly referring to freedom of speech /= reach & was still caught up by the platform auto-mod feature that is going to hide posts from accounts.

Don't be spammy? The false positive rate will be low to start and will improve.

Warpcast is centralized platform with it's own policies. Other clients are unaffected?

My reach is limited in a channel I created, AMA 🥲😂