Warpcast

1/ If you're providing feedback on "spam", it's really helpful if you're precise.

Is the cast:

1. Uninteresting — a "low effort reply", i.e. something that's boring or off-topic

2. Spammy — focused on getting something for free that you're not interested in, etc.

3. Malicious — phishing link, harassment

how would you categorize answers that appear authentic but are actually not authentic (eg AI-generated)? as "low effort" and #1?

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

Any reply that you don't find helpful is a negative experience.

Outside of a well-tuned personal algorithm, not really a solvable problem.

Fundamentally a problem that comes with size of audience / scale.

i was asking a clarifying question so i can be more precise with my feedback. respectfully, your reply doesn't answer my question.

AI-generated answers that seem interesting at first until you read and realize they don't really make sense and are "fake" -- should i be flagging those as #1?

Sorry, I assumed 1 was what you were saying.

Spam is a very specific problem — mass produced content that is a numbers game of getting some % to click.

A targeted, AI-generated uninteresting reply is more about making an account look "real".