Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1/ If you're providing feedback on "spam", it's really helpful if you're precise. Is the cast: 1. Uninteresting — a "low effort reply", i.e. something that's boring or off-topic 2. Spammy — focused on getting something for free that you're not interested in, etc. 3. Malicious — phishing link, harassment
32 replies
10 recasts
192 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
how would you categorize answers that appear authentic but are actually not authentic (eg AI-generated)? as "low effort" and #1?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Any reply that you don't find helpful is a negative experience. Outside of a well-tuned personal algorithm, not really a solvable problem. Fundamentally a problem that comes with size of audience / scale.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i was asking a clarifying question so i can be more precise with my feedback. respectfully, your reply doesn't answer my question. AI-generated answers that seem interesting at first until you read and realize they don't really make sense and are "fake" -- should i be flagging those as #1?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
