Video and longer casts are both examples of stuff people ask for and then don't use very often. 

Ultimately both were worth adding, but stated vs. revealed preference strikes again.

In some cases it can be a UX problem.

I don't use video much because I don't like the video player and most videos I want to share are on YouTube or some other platform.

It's easier to paste the link than to figure out how to download the video, especially on mobile.

Not sure about long casts since I do use them often now. Maybe people are not used to them yet or a better editor UX with more support for drafts and such could help.

Product decisions affect user behavior.

I like baking /goodbread and building apps on web3 protocols. DevRel @ ENS Labs. gregskril.com

The open web is dead, long live the open web. ⌐◨-◨

Building /warpcast and /farcaster

— gabrielayuso.com

@greg and others have claimed that.

If the content was novel and compelling, you would. :)

ux > content

if you disagree provide some *recent* examples to the contrary

*waves hands around this whole network*

sub-par UX but content was good enough people stuck around

give yourself more credit: for text-based content creation and consumption warpcast is average or above. video, not so much. at least make the video experience average before claiming SVRP