The irony is proof of human is way less valuable in web3 vs. web2.

In web2, you monetize via ads. At least right now, AIs (i.e. bots) aren't influenced by ads.

In web3, you monetize via transactions. AIs can do transactions. And as a developer, if you're monetizing via transactions, in most cases you don't care if the transaction is from a human or from an AI. You just care that it happened.

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

Why would proof of human reduce bot transactions?

Contributor to crypto, building at World / TFH, co-founder of PoolTogether Inc, instigator of pleasrDAO

https://leighton.mirror.xyz/

So then why care about proof of human? :)

Personally I care about it because I think asset distribution is key to economic mobility. All my professional work has been around helping people attain asset ownership (PoolTogether + World). 

I think it should increase bot activity if done well. Because more design space for human <> bot interactions

I think I would immediately stop using Warpcast if I knew I was the only human using it and everything else was bots