Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? it could: 1. amplify reach (shared audiences) 2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort) 3. build deeper connections maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?
31 replies
29 recasts
174 reactions
Ivy
@ivy
this sounds like the public/private clubhouse-like group chat @erik and I think @dwr.eth discussed at one point why wouldn't they just create a group chat for it instead?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Group chats aren't public
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ivy
@ivy
iirc the model being discussed was to have ppl who could view the group chat but couldn't say anything? hence hybrid model / what channels functionally are now
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
