Dan Romero on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp

Channel member migration plan 1. Last week, we previewed the upcoming channel changes 2. We want to ensure that existing channels have a set of members on Day 1 3. We’re proposing automatically converting active followers → members for channels. 4. We’re optimizing for something straightforward and pragmatic, not perfect. 5. We’re looking for feedback on this proposal. https://warpcast.notion.site/Channel-member-migration-plan-10a6a6c0c101802fb900d3e45d879271

50 replies

33 recasts

193 reactions

Samuel pfp

@samuellhuber.eth

Won’t that blow for large channels ? Or how’s moderation there going to factor in? Like /memes cc @nonlinear.eth

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp

Large channels will have to adjust to the new model. But we're optimistic that membership can scale, esp. through developer built tooling.

2 replies

0 recast

3 reactions

Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ pfp

Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ

@seneca is cooking an interesting solution for /nouns (and any other channel that wants to use it I assume) but it requires a small, high-signal membership to start. How will the “active followers” be decided? Can channels opt out and just start with no members if they want to try something different?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp

Are there accounts in the /nouns home feed now that wouldn't qualify?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ pfp

Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ

I think Seneca had the idea to start with noun holders only and is creating a frame solution that would allow members to invite other Nounish folk at a set rate, and so on and so forth in concentric circles outward. Right now the nouns feed I believe is just anyone with a certain Airstack social score (or whose post was liked by a panel of 10 volunteer moderators) so is probably a much larger starting group than “noun holders.”

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp

Got it. Do you or @seneca have a timeline for having a bot that checks for Nounish NFTs? Because if ready for end of next week, then it would allow you to essentially opt out.

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

seneca pfp

we're working on the invite system piece not the initial seeding. current migration plan options seem p good (and are more a one-off so not worth shifting focus for now).

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ pfp

Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ

Question for @seneca but that boy moves fast 💨

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction