Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Channel member migration plan 1. Last week, we previewed the upcoming channel changes 2. We want to ensure that existing channels have a set of members on Day 1 3. We’re proposing automatically converting active followers → members for channels. 4. We’re optimizing for something straightforward and pragmatic, not perfect. 5. We’re looking for feedback on this proposal. https://warpcast.notion.site/Channel-member-migration-plan-10a6a6c0c101802fb900d3e45d879271
40 replies
23 recasts
333 reactions
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
Won’t that blow for large channels ? Or how’s moderation there going to factor in? Like /memes cc @nonlinear.eth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Large channels will have to adjust to the new model. But we're optimistic that membership can scale, esp. through developer built tooling.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
@seneca is cooking an interesting solution for /nouns (and any other channel that wants to use it I assume) but it requires a small, high-signal membership to start. How will the “active followers” be decided? Can channels opt out and just start with no members if they want to try something different?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Are there accounts in the /nouns home feed now that wouldn't qualify?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
I think Seneca had the idea to start with noun holders only and is creating a frame solution that would allow members to invite other Nounish folk at a set rate, and so on and so forth in concentric circles outward. Right now the nouns feed I believe is just anyone with a certain Airstack social score (or whose post was liked by a panel of 10 volunteer moderators) so is probably a much larger starting group than “noun holders.”
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Got it. Do you or @seneca have a timeline for having a bot that checks for Nounish NFTs? Because if ready for end of next week, then it would allow you to essentially opt out.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
seneca
@seneca
we're working on the invite system piece not the initial seeding. current migration plan options seem p good (and are more a one-off so not worth shifting focus for now).
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
Question for @seneca but that boy moves fast 💨
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
