Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
PSA for future "shock images" Warpcast will nerf folks for explicit images. It's not deterministic, our judgement. This isn't a court. - I'll ask the user to delete the cast - If they don't, I'll nerf on Warpcast To be clear: the cast exists at the protocol. Similar to websites, Google doesn't have to index you.
30 replies
6 recasts
86 reactions

Jason Goldberg  pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
Not picking a fight. Genuinely curious. (And ❤️ debate) If users have option to unfollow, hide, mute, block, why does client need to nerf? So long as it’s not harming or threatening another person, why take such a heavy hand? I’m not saying you are wrong, just trying to understand your logic and policy.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1. Explicit images will get us banned from the App Store -- so until we have automated systems to flag / hide by default, don't want to deal with that 2. We use Imgur for image hosting, so if you're uploading from Warpcast affecting our API access 3. my pov 80%+ of users are fine with our judgement for now
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Again, if other apps think this is a winning strategy, by all means they should shout from the roof tops that their policy is better. I suspect most people will be fine with a reasonable approach.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions