Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
36 replies
3 recasts
93 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Wrote up my thoughts here. Thanks for the nudge. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x16de8c53
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
say you're able to grow qDAU and successfully empower other clients (hypothetically). another client (a non twitter clone) achieves escape velocity user growth, far exceeding any other on the protocol. why wouldn't they fork farcaster? they could presumably achieve consensus of the new thing with enough scale.
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Sure. So then maybe it’s long-term useful to have a good client that ultimately cares about the protocol and isn’t just a reference client. ;)
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
and if i wanted to make a client we could just agree that it can be successful but not too successful
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction