Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Is Grok open sourcing its weights significant? https://github.com/xai-org/grok
10 replies
7 recasts
150 reactions
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Yes. Corporate OSS in general is significant. Software should be free, its distributions/managed products should be paid. Best examples: cal.com, Twenty CRM.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
@king
@gm8xx8
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
IMO no. Open sourcing their code would be helpful, but open sourcing the weights of a ~5th rate model is overrated.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
not parzival
@alexpaden
it’s cool to do but not making waves
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jj 🛟
@jj
For the people who have the resources, they can now use RLHF to fine tune to build a very different version of ChatGPT, grok, Claude, etc… the weights are actually a big deal. Many more startups can actually build a standalone foundational model that might be specific to an industry
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
yeah, it's culturally significant. is Grok itself the SOTA? no. will OpenAI release anything differently? possibly, yes.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mack 💫
@mwmw
imo the weights themselves no the open sourcing of them yes
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ian
@iturner.eth
Absolutely, I’ll have grok summarizing the feed in no time
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bitsofjeremy (.eth, .sol)
@bitsofjeremy
Oh hey they did it. They actually released it. Gonna need a bigger computer and GPU
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Uncle HODL
@unclehodl.eth
Grok doesn’t even do things like analyze your following/followers etc… best thing it does is roast you based on your content 😭 Could be something though? 🤷♂️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
