Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
i disconnected the nook signer and all my casts made from nook got deleted πŸ₯²
32 replies
12 recasts
93 reactions

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
Umm, 😳 how is that possible? They were ultimately written to the protocol, no? Did you expect that behavior @pugson
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
i did. from what i understand they are still there but hubs only index casts that are signed. removing the signature drops them from being available. https://warpcast.com/darrylyeo/0x297fa179
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
Oh shit, that seems like a design flaw worth addressing. It torpedos a bunch of what was good (in my mental model) of the protocol. Without that, any kind of β€œclient opportunity” rhetoric has a defacto hole in the sack! Thanks for helping me sync my mental model with current reality @pugson & @darrylyeo
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
How would you design it differently?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Claus Wilke pfp
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
Not sure about the technical limitations that may make this hard/impossible, but the mental model I think most people would have is that revoking a signer means no future transactions can be signed but past transactions remain valid. 1/2
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
cross-ref:(wip): https://warpcast.com/pjc/0x51f5ea5e
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction