Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverse_incentive
13 replies
4 recasts
49 reactions
Joe Toledano pfp
Joe Toledano
@joetoledano
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_campaign
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
https://warpcast.com/betashop.eth/0x66000c14
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
✿ ZACH HARRIS ✿ pfp
✿ ZACH HARRIS ✿
@zachharris.eth
What about incentives roulette? Perverse only 1/6th of the time.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
TIL I learned about erradicating cobras in India -- which made me think of the python bounties in FL. And now I probably won't be able to sleep tonight due to snake nightmares. Thanks Dan.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
Would it still helpful to maintain a public registry of spamming account, maybe without the incentive?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
Yes (memerel), at the same time HOP successfully incentivized their community to combat airdrop farmers so it can be done. The fact that it's hard to implement doesn't mean it's impossible. But IMO it's not worth the effort because the current methods work pretty well
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3 pfp
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
I’m in favor of a cast action an OP can use on replies to penalize them. Not sure what penalize exactly looks like, and yeah, maybe it can be abused, but I kind of like it 😈
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Kreept.degen.eth pfp
Kreept.degen.eth
@kreept
More or less like a slippery slope if we tow that line. But how sustainable would putting users in the spam list be where it still doesn’t yield results?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kardon.degen.eth🧾 pfp
kardon.degen.eth🧾
@kardon
I'm supporting you through @microsub! 713 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Player1Taco pfp
Player1Taco
@player1taco
I'm supporting you through @microsub! 29 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ddjking12444 pfp
ddjking12444
@ddjking123
123
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jessi ⌐◨-◨ 🤫🌭 pfp
Jessi ⌐◨-◨ 🤫🌭
@zwillow
Negative $Degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zenigame pfp
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
Cobras. Cobras everywhere.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Loudman.⌐◨-◨ 🏴‍☠️ pfp
Loudman.⌐◨-◨ 🏴‍☠️
@loudman.eth
$sloppy (not a token) earned when people tips you slop. Negative impact on social score
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agb pfp
agb
@damag.eth
so basically this is saying people would breed spam accounts and then report those accounts, get incentivised and then repeat ♻️ i think you’re taking the correct decision for spam labelling. tough, but impactful long term.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
SSR pfp
SSR
@ssr
How to fix this? Am i get banned or what sir? Googling this can't find solution
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Edward H. Carpenter pfp
Edward H. Carpenter
@ehcarpenter
This is literally the definition of the effects of social tokens like $DEGEN, $farther and $Moxie... Devs wanted to foster engagement * - but, oh, wait... not THAT kind of engagement! So shadowbans, jails, V2s, shifting eligibility criteria, and two-class systems are imposed to try to close the barn door. Note: each of these tokens represents an improvement over NO-token systems like 'X', IMO... yet they all still beg the question ⤵️ * But who profited from the original "pumps" of all these "perverse incentive tokens" ?? 🤔 🫢🫣🤫
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction