Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Should help people who are good faith trying to engage and adjust how they cast. Reminder, if you're casting in your own home feed, channel or replying to people you who follow you, the spam model doesn't focus on that. It's only if you're excessively replying to people who don't follow you (with no engagement).
38 replies
20 recasts
122 reactions
sean
@swabbie.eth
feels like a lose-lose for new accounts. new users have been consistently told that replies are how they can get noticed. it’s more likely than not that they’ll initially not get reactions to those replies most of the time
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
People who reply at a casual rate won't be affected. There's a small number of users who generate a massive number of unrequited replies.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
sean
@swabbie.eth
that sounds reasonable in theory, but it seems that in reality a good number of genuinely real people are being misclassified. interested to see how the new system plays out
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> good number of genuinely real people are being misclassified The core issue is not determining "genuinely real people". Whether you are a human or not doesn't change if your behavior -- excessive replies with no engagement -- is spammy or not.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sean
@swabbie.eth
rather than "genuine" i should have said "earnest" - i'm referring to their desire to reply in a contributive way. i don't think quantity of replies is a good way of measuring that. let's also remember that we should be expecting the average reply "IQ" to be 100. it's common for smart people to expect too much of most people. unless warpcast is not targeting the average person on average.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
