Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
the EF would not be able to "save" ethereum even if they tried ethereum is decentralized - it's up to you and me to build cool shit that normal people can and want to use crying to the EF is effectively crying "can devs do something". we're past that. grow up.
7 replies
4 recasts
58 reactions
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
(agree, but devil advocating: ) i don't blame people who (even knowingly) don't differentiate between eth and ef. it's pretty common today to equate the product to the company. and even though it's an obvious (from my perspective) error, i can't say it's completely unforced. so i'm wondering if eth would be better off without ef, or at least with a foundation that would have a more sensibly chosen name. (if i saw a company named "bitcoin foundation" i'd immediately think it's a grift)
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
.
@chaskin.eth
I would agree with that if it was newer people complaining, but the people who have been toxic 24/7 about the ef on x have been around for >5 years
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
i think both can be true at the same time. i don't know what's going on inside the ef, but you'll find toxic people — be it for stupidity, malevolence or power games — everywhere. then it's about how easy it is to find fuel for the fire (it's really easy now given the price action). anyway, i didn't want to leave the impression that i thought ef was useless, just dumping my (layman's) observation.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
