Farcaster

why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? 

it could:
1. amplify reach (shared audiences)  
2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort)
3. build deeper connections  

maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?

been thinking about channels ever since @ted posted this

how does farcaster reward people for going deeper on a subject? how does it incentivize @matthewb to share about drinking chocolates or @keccers.eth to go deep on her health stack?

basically…i want to replace my reddit searches with farcaster searches

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

building /juicebox | product marketing & growth | prev. NounsDAO, RAW DAO | learning to code

Just not sure there’s enough people to go too deep on any topic just yet. Unless it’s Ethereum :P

I am a wealth of knowledge - unfortunately my knowledge is useless | Game Designer | /sands-of-sumaii

i think fewer, high-quality posters can actually be an advantage

Perhaps! I guess the buzz word is “high-signal”

But in the case of gaming, there’s not much here. All of it is on X. 

I’m trying my best to post consistently but tbh not many people work in the space here