Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
My take on this is that an ERC20 token is mandatory to expand our ecosystem and cultivate sustainable growth. However the key we need to shape in order to unlock the potential, is the value we bake into the token - it can't be solely subject to trading. It's too binary and doesn't create connection. Value can be: - Tickets to events funded by Nouns are only available for $nouns - Products that are funded by Nouns are only available for $nouns Obviously we are going to end up in the discussion about "not everyone is onboarded to web3 jadajadajada". If that's truly a fear - although I'd rather base it on actual insights, all we need to do is make *better* things that are more *desirable*. In general, I think we will do ourselves a massive favor by moving away from "onboarding" towards building things that ATTRACT people to Nouns and therefor are eager to leap into acquiring their first $nouns. attracting > onboarding nobody wants to be "onboarded" anyways.
1 reply
0 recast
18 reactions
SQX
@sqx
$nogs has tickets -> distribution for holding. emissions from holdings. linked but loosely. so not dependent around secondary pricing of NFT. $nogs has really done a good job IMO. not sure why we dont just accept it. ALSO has a DEEP liq pool . DEEEEEEEEEEEP cc @dotnouns $nogs x $flows (i feel like something powerful here... not sure what or why though) cc @rocketman i played with $nouns, it was nothing but a headache from start to finish.
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
dotnouns.⌐◨-◨
@dotnouns
I can only imagine how fast $nogs would grow if it would get even a minimal recognition by those few nouners. I never truly understood why, but it is what is! What really counts is that: 1) it will reach greatness anyway 2) it will continue to work to make the whole ecosystem and any other nounish token ($nouns and anything else) more valuable and adopted ⌐◨-◨
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
