dids
@dids
0 reply
7 recasts
23 reactions
51 replies
26 recasts
362 reactions
18 replies
21 recasts
106 reactions
8 replies
10 recasts
73 reactions
0 reply
9 recasts
11 reactions
4 replies
6 recasts
55 reactions
2 replies
3 recasts
15 reactions
3 replies
3 recasts
18 reactions
I feel like this is the right channel to have this discussion.
@mazmhussain do you think we'll be able to find a solution to the "post-truth" situation we're in? I thought about it when I saw your cast about the meme with the UFOs, saying that ppl didn't even care when NSA confirmed UFOs are real, because they're bombarded with information.
I feel like the problem is not so much the "volume" than the "quality". We went from a state where "I saw it on TV= it's true" to "I don't trust anything I see/hear by default". Related to that, we seem to have internalized the fact that objectivity/neutrality doesn't exist, there's only partisan opinions. Even if there's some truth to it, I feel like it's a slippery slope, because it tends to put in the same bag journalists who, while having opinions, aim at neutrality, and journalist who don't care at all and go for full bias. It's a small nuance, but a very important one imo.
Happy to hear ppl's thoughts on this, and be pointed to thinkers who went over this matter. 4 replies
7 recasts
39 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
12 reactions
0 reply
6 recasts
9 reactions
0 reply
9 recasts
11 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
8 reactions
