Content
@
0 reply
26 recasts
26 reactions
df
@df
So Farcaster currently costs $6 for storing 5000 casts 2500 reactions 2500 follows on hubs. What would be the cost of putting this data on base today now that we have blobs? Same question, but for an L3? gifting degen to good answers
7 replies
4 recasts
71 reactions
df
@df
worth noting that the Farcaster storage fee is not the cost, but a sybil fee, so the comparison isn't fair. I'm just curious how far off it is
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
hellno the optimist
@hellno.eth
napkin math: 0.01965 ETH ~= $80 USD - might be missing a fee or something else - assumes 786432 Gwei as blob fee per block and 0.001 ETH as transaction fee per block byte sizes of the Farcaster types: https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/98
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
The problem to me is not the cost of storing these on Base, the problem is the cost of creating a Base transaction for every single cast/reaction/follow, and also handling the pruning (maybe ?) of the data.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Murat
@murat
As blob adoption increases and block builders/relays on L1 see their effects on latency, prices will go up significantly as blobs have to compete with mev. L3 approach may have additional savings, but I would say it's too early to get to anything conclusive
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Felirami 🎩🍖
@felirami.eth
This man asking the real questions right here!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
al3jandro
@al3jandro
TotalCost = ((5000*CastSize + 2500*ReactionSize + 2500*FollowSize) * txFee_Prior_Dencun ) / Blob_factor Based on my readings, Blob_factor would be 5, but this is still to be define based on blockchain congestion (Supply/Demand)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zener
@zenerbaba.eth
Bu ne amk
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
