df
@df
Had a call with an industry titan in product management yesterday. He asked me in which ways web3 social can be: Cheaper, Faster or Better than web2 social? I had an answer that I thought was compelling, but his follow up questions were challenging. I'd be (genuinely) curious of what you think is the strongest answer
32 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
what was his challenging following up question?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
df
@df
There were a couple, paraphrasing roughly: - if there's a large market opportunity for X, and it's possible in web2, why haven't web2 players capitalized - portability of the social graph can be done by phone contacts today, what's the problem - is X really a better experience for the end user?
5 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
2 - is that true? I don’t have the phone number nor email address of majority of my connections in Twitter or Facebook
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
- emm.. this is almost the same type of questions with 'if fang decided to steal your lunch you are screwed so you should quit' - yes email and phone. but you can easier tweet them, so we could try something better like email.. - this is very hard in terms of ux cuz crypto ux sucks for now..
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
@kc here
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
1 - innovator’s dilemma. The market opportunity may not be apparent on day 1, and incumbents do not want to hurt their baseline. Example: Kodak and digital cameras. But the key question is whether decentralized social is trielt something disrupting rather than merely an improvement.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nickolas Tazes | Watchen.xyz
@tazes
-because the opportunity here lies in the blockchain -social graph is now extended because it includes content, not just content -yes, experiences can always be improved Am I missing something?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
