Had a call with an industry titan in product management yesterday.

He asked me in which ways web3 social can be:
Cheaper, Faster or Better than web2 social?

I had an answer that I thought was compelling, but his follow up questions were challenging.
I'd be (genuinely) curious of what you think is the strongest answer

Building Larry, FOSS via @frames, @framesfun /open-frames to help decentralized social win. a16z CSX23. farcasterchannels.com farcaster.id

what was his challenging following up question?

building degencast.wtf /degencast, ex-synfutures, binance, bitmain

Chiang Mai, Mueang Chiang Mai District, Chiang Mai, Thailand

There were a couple, paraphrasing roughly:
- if there's a large market opportunity for X, and it's possible in web2, why haven't web2 players capitalized
- portability of the social graph can be done by phone contacts today, what's the problem
- is X really a better experience for the end user?

1 - innovator’s dilemma. The market opportunity may not be apparent on day 1, and incumbents do not want to hurt their baseline. Example: Kodak and digital cameras. But the key question is whether decentralized social is trielt something disrupting rather than merely an improvement.