Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
33 replies
8 recasts
116 reactions
David Furlong
@df
I’ve pushed back on many things re Farcaster protocol / client dynamics, but I don’t follow your argument. Does gmail want to avoid being dependent on SMTP? Even if thats given, why does it follow that its winner take all?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
gmail isn't competing with an SMTP client
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
