Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matt 💭 pfp
matt 💭
@matthewmorek
working at a pre-PMF startup requires a change in perspective when it comes to quality. you can't afford to ship everything 95% polished, because you can't afford to invest that much effort in ideas which are likely to flop ship as much quality as it's possible, but not much more until you find PMF. then go WILD
3 replies
1 recast
19 reactions

Timur Badretdinov pfp
Timur Badretdinov
@destiner.eth
what are some examples of apps that invested into quality only once they hit pmf? i my experience, the quality can only go down over time, never up
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Arti Villa pfp
Arti Villa
@artivilla.eth
don’t know any. ship your unique features high quality, leave the table stakes like team or account pages imo. poor quality work gets no users especially early adopters who try so many things.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

matt 💭 pfp
matt 💭
@matthewmorek
linear is maybe not a good example because they went ape on quality from day 0 raycast is a good example imo; very good from the start, but it’s only getting better since they hit pmf and started charging for pro the quality bar is insane in both cases
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction