Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
moxie / tipping metas need to add a cost to each reply if I reply 100 times and get a minuscule amount of total engagement I should earn 0 or even go negative
5 replies
47 recasts
49 reactions
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
If you reply too much in a period of time you go straight to moxie jail That’s pretty negative
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
how much is too much? one reply less than this limit incurs no cost? what if a honest actor getting a lot of engagement goes over this limit? a general -X for every reply seems a lot more robust and less reactive
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
also do and should replies earn moxie at all? seems like this incentivizes endless tiresome notifications without adding much value top level casts are valuable and don’t suffer from the same negative externality when inevitably done in mass by farmers
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
Replies do earn because often the value is in the replies. If I cast asking: what is the best movie you’ve seen this year that I probably haven’t? I earn for prompting the conversation And replies earn for providing the answers And the best answers as determined by the community’s engagement earn most It works
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
koisose.lol
@koisose
i'm also thinking like probably warpcast should introduce or maybe even @supercast need to introduce most relevant like x(twitter) maybe filter by their farscore
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
