Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Justin Hunter
@polluterofminds
With SIWF, is there a way for the connected wallet to be the one that signs the message? It's always the custodial address it seems. Use case: I need to know the connected wallet server side, and passing it in as a query param or part of the body means this information can be changed. I could do a check to see if the fid has the user-passed address as one of their wallets, but even then it can cause issues and things can be manipulated.
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
no this would require getting two signed messages from each of the wallets there is this FIP that will be implemented soon but it still won't work for every connected address. it'd be too complex of a security model if every connected wallet also could impersonate your farcaster identity
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/225
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction