Web3 newsletters & publishing.

We automatically summarize and cast about the best posts on Paragraph.

Live The Game. Real-time, immersive social markets for sports & live events. /bracket

Since FC hub data is public, what's the benefit of using SIWF over connecting with a wallet and associating a FC account (like @paragraph @bracketgame et al), and just pulling the social graph / content as needed?

Especially since connecting a wallet is more decentralized than doing OAuth facilitated by Warpcast?

I think the most practical reason is that you're more likely to get Farcaster users to adopt given the dogfood culture

The theoritical but not practical case is the FC identity is stable, I have a few different wallets and it's annoying that I've signed into different services with different wallets and don't remember which

What would make this go in practice if the default FC wallet was a smart wallet that had passkey signers and so you could SIWF without having to grab your mobile phone putting it on par with ease of other social sign ins

Building @warpcast and @farcaster, new dad, like making food

1. Farcaster users will adopt anyway - they're not discerning between SIWE and SIWF from my experience. See bracket, paragraph, most of the used apps use external wallets (for now)

2. This makes sense, but is basically suggesting that FC/WC will become the wallet. I use metamask on desktop this way -- ie. as my address aggregator

3. I don't follow this one, could you explain a bit more?