Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Very simple spec for a first cut of programmable DCs. Plan is to basically expose a thin layer on top of internal Warpcast APIs. We don't know enough about the final shape of public DC APIs, so will keep it simple to start. https://warpcast.notion.site/Public-Draft-Programmable-DCs-v1-50d9d99e34ac4d10add55bd26a91804f
21 replies
26 recasts
169 reactions

Shashank  pfp
Shashank
@0xshash
- how can I opt out if I'm too annoyed with the messages? - how are messages/ webhooks secured? - recommend adding some kind of tag + visual indicator to differentiate automated dcs vs human dcs - would be nice to set an idempotency key in the request to avoid odd duplicates in the conversation -
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Tony D’Addeo  pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
good questions 1) there will be an opt in mechanism, still being designed but open to ideas 2) for now simple API keys 3) likely won't be there to start to KISS but am agreement that differentiation will be useful 4) good call, updated doc with idem key
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Agadoo 🎩 pfp
Agadoo 🎩
@agadoo
Agree about KISS and late to this but 1000% agree with Shash about 3 (need for an indicator). Even just a little robot symbol 🤖. I can see the benefit of exposing an API for DCs but is so open to abuse (spam/scams) that need all the help we can get to tell people ‘this is automated’
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction