Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

aneri.base.eth pfp
aneri.base.eth
@aneri
Curious if Farcaster could ever support private profiles viewable to accepted followers only (like X, IG, etc.), either for Warpcast or other clients, or if the nature of decentralized social and content being available in hubs and accessible by anyone means that's not technically possible (in near term/current architecture)
10 replies
1 recast
21 reactions

karan πŸ‘‘ pfp
karan πŸ‘‘
@defikaran.eth
It can, and we will! If you’d use something like this. We’ll add it to Wildcard :)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

aneri.base.eth pfp
aneri.base.eth
@aneri
awesome! not something i think id use today but was curious for the future as the network gets better! technically, how would it work? if i posted on wildcard and posted with a private profile, how would another client like warpcast not be able to surface that content?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

karan πŸ‘‘ pfp
karan πŸ‘‘
@defikaran.eth
To make it work across clients, on top of my mind is.. encrypted content. Same way a decentralised chat procols work. We'll need a FIP.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

aneri.base.eth pfp
aneri.base.eth
@aneri
Yep makes a lot of sense! I think if network 10x there’d be a great case for private content. In the meantime I think token gated group chats/ messaging can solve.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction