Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
aneri.base.eth pfp
aneri.base.eth
@aneri
Curious if Farcaster could ever support private profiles viewable to accepted followers only (like X, IG, etc.), either for Warpcast or other clients, or if the nature of decentralized social and content being available in hubs and accessible by anyone means that's not technically possible (in near term/current architecture)
10 replies
1 recast
21 reactions
karan đź‘‘ pfp
karan đź‘‘
@defikaran.eth
It can, and we will! If you’d use something like this. We’ll add it to Wildcard :)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chinmay 🕹️🍿 pfp
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
I wonder what you would be interested in hiding -- profile pic, bio, some posts, your interactions, something else. It mostly can be done, but it means you might have to give up some ownership or discoverability or in some cases decentralization itself.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp
Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
Theoretically could be done by encrypting any private casts (and then accepted followers would have a key to decrypt, would need to figure out how to share between clients) The casts would still be in the protocol and could show up on other clients but would just look like gibberish so they'd likely want to filter them out It will be interesting to see how the Merkle team implements direct casts in the protocol which I believe will be E2EE and would likely provide a blueprint for how to make private casts work as well
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
fwiw anyone can make these private profiles off chain and in a new client & if it does well enough maybe other clients like Warpcast could adopt it! this would be cool to see
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
adnum pfp
adnum
@adnum
Even if protocol does not allow it a client can encrypt messages and decrypt them only to certain users. Making it private to that client and its users.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
johnkrausphotos pfp
johnkrausphotos
@dsre882268
Wouldn’t we have to bridge our selves to the other desired chain in order to share information and data Only other way is with links! This is why Farcaster is superior but it doesn’t really give us any other kids to play with yet! Early.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
O_Satisfying pfp
O_Satisfying
@olqnzyjablviqqe
Even if protocol does not allow it a client can encrypt messages and decrypt them only to certain users. Making it private to that client and its users.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TheHackersNews pfp
TheHackersNews
@zmgxukwfarucom
Even if protocol does not allow it a client can encrypt messages and decrypt them only to certain users. Making it private to that client and its users.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TrungTPhan pfp
TrungTPhan
@ncoy153032
It can, and we will! If you’d use something like this. We’ll add it to Wildcard :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sirmole.eth đź‘ľ pfp
Sirmole.eth đź‘ľ
@sirmole
Why do u want a private profile…..that’s changing the status quo because dats no longer decentralized……
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction