Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Milo
@mrroflwaffles
"post after post of nothing" is exactly why social incentives are so dangerous - they are incredibly effective for generating *volume*, but algorithms can only approximate what "good" volume really is so, eventually people find a meta of minimum input -> max incentive reward, and the ecosystem goes sideways. (cont)
11 replies
3 recasts
71 reactions
Milo
@mrroflwaffles
i think @tervo is suffering from an amplified version of this due to the success of /replyguys , and prob feels this is a problem with level of replyguy effort, but i think it's much moreso a systemic issue farcaster is prob going to need to address this from the platform side eventually. why? cont
2 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
tervo🗣️
@tervo
agreed big time wrt systemic issue. evidently i am just more bothered by it than many, which i understand can easily become foolishly fighting the nature of these things. must look for design changes that stop them in ways beyond the capabilities of human moderators. bc its just not gonna happen. need ai agents or sumn
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
datafeed 🔒
@datafeed
Come for the degen, then once the distribution normalizes to modest amount per user / or dries up, hopefully they stay for the alpha and content. Oh yeah then there's a hole you own your data concept, which is kind of a big deal once you figure it out.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction