Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Milo
@mrroflwaffles
"post after post of nothing" is exactly why social incentives are so dangerous - they are incredibly effective for generating *volume*, but algorithms can only approximate what "good" volume really is so, eventually people find a meta of minimum input -> max incentive reward, and the ecosystem goes sideways. (cont)
11 replies
3 recasts
71 reactions
Milo
@mrroflwaffles
i think @tervo is suffering from an amplified version of this due to the success of /replyguys , and prob feels this is a problem with level of replyguy effort, but i think it's much moreso a systemic issue farcaster is prob going to need to address this from the platform side eventually. why? cont
2 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
tervo🗣️
@tervo
agreed big time wrt systemic issue. evidently i am just more bothered by it than many, which i understand can easily become foolishly fighting the nature of these things. must look for design changes that stop them in ways beyond the capabilities of human moderators. bc its just not gonna happen. need ai agents or sumn
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
LONO 🎩🐹
@lono.eth
you're probably going to need to bring on more moderators
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
RJ (replyor)
@shulzzz
keep fighting the good fight. very respectable. crap content, tft and bots are rampant. unfortunately that's what gets amplified and it's snowball effect. good content gets buried. one idea -- you lose points to post and need to earn it back with reactions. people may think twice. and /lp is testing tomatoes for this.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
multicore
@multicore
"Mass adoption" syndrome, people eventually find a way to exploit every algorithm and pervert it. At least we don't have porn and conspiracy theories yet, guess that's coming in the next wave.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
