Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mishaal pfp
Mishaal
@mishaal.eth
Discuss https://open.substack.com/pub/jchanolm/p/there-will-be-blood
5 replies
0 recast
24 reactions

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
Seems like the article brings up points that apply to any “state” seeking sovereign control of territory – but not all Network States necessarily have that goal?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Mishaal pfp
Mishaal
@mishaal.eth
Yeah, but I wonder if a network state doesn’t attract violence from a neighboring state or internal violence. Is it really successful? Set another way if you’re uniquely innovating but not deterring, someone will come for your stuff.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jordan pfp
Jordan
@ruminations
Hey, good question. Balaji's definition of a network state includes (eventual) control over territory and diplomatic recognition of that territory. "that crowdfunds territory around the world and eventually gains diplomatic recognition from pre-existing states." So if a network state doesn't seek sovereign control over territory it isn't really a "Network State"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction